Compassion

I think compassion makes the difference between humans and robots. Without compassion and emotion, we would only be thinking logically all the time. Sometimes, we need a little love in our life. It’s what keeps us sane a lot of the times. We need to have a balance between our mind and our heart. With the right amount of emotion and logic, we can most of the time make proper and right decisions. Of course there will be some times where they both clash into each other .For example, choosing the love your life and choosing you dream job thousands of miles away. Are you going to sacrifice your love or your dream? Both the situations are conflicted with each other. The logical approach would be to take the dream job; you are doing what you love and receiving money to keep you financially stable. For the emotional side, choosing the love of your life would make sense. You are most likely going to be spending the rest of your life together, why cause any rifts in it? For both sides to balance each other out, you would need to have a balance of both situations. If you think from both sides, you can have the best of both worlds. In the previous situation, you could have a long distance relationship and still keep the dream job. We need compassion to balance out our thoughts. This goes to same with rationality.  Two halves combined together make a whole. That is how we receive a harmonic virtue. 

Positives and Negatives

With the amount of technology and materials we have today, it really is easy to get any information at the tip of our fingers. Regardless of who you are, there is information ready for you faster than the speed of light. And with that information, we are able to analyze where the problem lies in a situation. For example, an average person needs at least 2 meals to function. If they do not get enough food in their system, then that person cannot make it through the day. Regardless of how wealthy or poor you are, you need food to function. However, there are different methods of obtaining that food to eat. Again, depending on how wealthy or poor you are, you need some type of job or a way of receiving money to get access to food. Of course, the wealthy have no problem with this situation. They have the money to gain food 24 hours a day. The poor on the other hand, well it isn’t that easy. The word poor itself has a bad connotation. Anyone having to live with that connotation is obviously not going to have all the hopes and dreams in the world.

            Living in a dog-eat-dog world, we have grown accustomed to the circumstances that have risen in society. We ignore the problems which have been with us for several decades. We simply have given them the blind-eye and no longer see it. Society has done this for centuries, not because there isn’t an answer for any of the problems but simply because we do not know where to start.  We don’t know where to dive in first. The problem for taking advantage of the poor is such a massive hole, so that where ever you start, you end up falling. Tackling such a big issue will require a big effort and most importantly, will need to the acceptance of the average and wealthy people. If we don’t get their acceptance or even acknowledgment from them, there really is no point in continuing forward. After all, they are the people to keep carrying it onward after the initial stages.  

            There have been several social movements in the past which have tried to disrupt the vicious cycle. While one movement started off with a main cause, it later developed other movements which in a way deal with the main topic. It has been five years since the Occupy Wall Street Movement and we have yet to see a change in our society. The movement was about the 99% against the 1%. The 1% are basically the wealthy, the people who have taken most of the country’s private money. There have been statistics about who exactly were protesting, and I feel that the numbers are true. According to a 2011 survey¹, 49% of the protesters were under 30. This technically shows who actually care about the movement. While there were many people over the age of 40, the mass majority were the younger generation. Yes, the movement did stir up quite a motion, saying how it was the next American Revolution. But here we are years later, still waiting for change.

            There is always a reason for everything. Whether it is a scientific approach or a spiritual approach, there is always a reason. And the fact that the wealthy are ahead of the poor is in fact a no brainer. The ones with more power will obviously be ahead of the others. Thus being the reason why the wealthy have a slighter edge than the poor. So the wealthy do deserve what they are receiving. In the end it makes sense.

            If we were to hypothetically let the poor flourish and give them benefits, what would be the outcome of it all? Would it benefit society in total or would everything still be the same? There is always a reason why someone is poor. It could be anything; gender, race, environment, ethics, priorities. But are we not giving them some type of benefit? I am sure that they are given some type of money from the government. But where is that money going? Are the poor using that money for education or lively use? I can guarantee that most of the time, that money is not used properly.

            Are we really providing lesser education to the poor? I feel as if the angle of how you see it matters. If you were to look at the situation from different sides, you are going to see totally different situations. From one side, the poor are getting no attention whatsoever and they are very miserable. On another side, it looks like they are getting the proper attention and materials but they are not using it properly. Another angle will show how the wealthy and normal society not caring for the problem. As you can see, there are different approaches and different ways to see a problem. You will know when a problem is big enough when all the angles and sides are showing the same thing.

¹ http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/10/19/who-is-occupying-wall-street-a-pollster-surveys-protester/

Public Schools

The schools in the Bay Area which are being persistently low-achievers have several reasons why they are in that state. Just like the schools in Savage Inequalities, there are students which are not getting a proper and fair education. Some people will say it is environment, ethnicity, equality of teaching; it could be any of these things. These problems are part of the inevitable. We can’t change that. But what we can do is fix these problems. And we aren’t. These problems are not getting fixed and we are just watching our students suffer.  There is this big ignorance pattern which has been following us for many years. We saw it in the schools in the 80’s, and we see it today as well. Nothing has changed.

            Why do we take pride in our education, our equality, our freedom, our own self if we can’t even take care of those things? We say we have all these things when in reality, they are all cut short. And even if we did have all those amazing things, we wouldn’t use them to their full capacity. In the past thirty years, we have seen different presidents, different religions, new technology, the works. But why are the main fundamentals of our country still the same after 50 years? In one of the schools in Camden, New Jersey, they were still using type writers as a technological resource in the late 80’s. Computers were well and alive in those days. And even today, if you were to go into a low-achieving school, you would see 10 year old monitors running a system which is years older than the students using them. If we have to rely on outdated materials just to teach and make a point to our students then there truly is no hope.

            Low test scores, high dropout rates. The Bay Area has a large amount of schools in the whole area. With schools being about a couple miles away from each other, we don’t necessary have the issue of overcrowding classes. But we do have the issue of the students in the classes. Students haven’t been trying hard enough to make up their schools. Schools are receiving low grants and credibility due to the students test scores.  And since students aren’t doing well on their tests, they lose the hope to continue forward and dropout early. There are several ways to solve this problem. We need to show those students that there is help and that everyone cares. If we were to show someone who has lost hope in everything that we care, we could make a difference in that child’s life. 

Students care less because others care less. This notion or idea is very unfair to children of all ages. They are getting treated like this because some people still hold a grudge against their ancestors or their previous generations. The whole idea of moving on just doesn’t seem to be there. These kids are suffering and are losing their future due to what, environment, race, ethnicity, social standing? These children should have no idea how racism occurs or how inequality is getting the best of us. The fact that they know this and are mature about it goes to show that these kids deserve better than what they have. Why are the futures of children from a lower social class sacrificed for one wealthy child? Do the lower children not have the same priority as the wealthier children? We are using century’s old thinking instead of a modern thought which has already affected our own and the next generations future. 

Our brains are trained to think and process in a common standard. The way we eat, sleep, drink, breath; all are a standard function in everyone. So naturally people would think that the way we are taught and the way we learn should be the same for everyone. With this still being a problem, as it was in the past, there hasn’t been any signs of reform lately. We all say that progress is good, change is good, but why isn’t it happening? Our education system is flawed and people very well know about it as well. Is it the fear from our government, fear of speaking up against powerful people? It could be anything, but nothing is happening. If our system continues to be flawed, then what is the point in believing in a future generation? They are being taught the same way the previous generation was taught and we see how it is coming out. Why do we keep pretending that tomorrow is going to look better when in reality it is going to be the same as it was the day, year, decade, century before?

I have heard of TED talks here and there but I have never really gotten around to actually watching one and analyzing it. I feel that this talk was a good introduction for me. Sir Ken Robinson is a very good speaker. His voice is clear and precise and the fact that he has a British accent just tops the cake. I have to admit, in the beginning of the video, I wasn't paying that much attention to what he was saying. Then I started hearing a few jokes and some wise-cracks. And suddenly, I was hooked! He then came to a topic which coincides with my education subject about students and teachers. He said that countries are reforming our education but reforming is only meant for “broken models”. We should get rid of the old and start anew and learn from our mistakes. That really struck me and I totally agree with that opinion. If people see that we need change in a system that’s long overdue, and are making changes, why are there still problems affecting everyone?

Another little topic he approached was about how kindergarten of all places, has come to the same level as college in admission wise. I mean it’s kindergarten for crying out loud! The place where you learn numbers and learn how to read! There are now interview processes taking place just to get a spot in a class. A funny little saying was "You've been around for 36 months, and this is it"? I enjoyed that piece. But on a serious note, people are taking this very seriously. They think that this school or that nursery is the gateway to my child’s future. C’mon, three years old and you already have a college set for your kid? The way people think kids of that age deserve the very best education to get to college is a monstrosity.    

Reeling in Research

The Passion Project has a lot of different ideas and different topics roaming around the video. From the obvious topic of passion, to family pressure and risks; all of those main ideas have been thoroughly discussed and have a lot of insight between them. Looking at each topic individually makes it seem like there isn’t any connection between all of them. However looking at it as a whole ‘project’, then the ideas seems to come together. After going over and reading the Passion Project again, I understand why each topic was approached and discussed. I really liked the fact that each of the speakers had experience and knowledge about what they were talking about. These guys are normal people and they are just like us. One of the quotes from the Passion Project which really struck me was “[Passion is] something that drives you, that excites you, makes you feel good” (1). My passion has been mock trial ever since I started high school. The rush of seeing lawyers and judges in a courtroom excites me. I guess I am pretty lucky because my passion can end up as a big part of my future. But another issue which was discussed was that if you wanted to survive in the real world, then you have to push the passions in the back seat. In a dog-eat-dog world, money is what drives people. We have been taught that without money, we will not have a proper future. With articles suggesting how “Following your passion will send you to the poorhouse”, how can anyone even imagine to have a passion in the first place (Henderson)? “If the market doesn’t value [your passions] as highly as you do, you… have to… pare down your lifestyles until you can afford to live on what you can get paid [for]” (Henderson). If the young generation were to read these quotes at such a young age, they would lose all there hope for anything they desired and would basically become living robots. Shooting for ideas which can only financially support you.

Henderson, J. Maureen. "3 Reasons Following Your Passion Will Send You To The Poorhouse." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 11 Feb. 2013. Web. 01 Sept. 2013.